Gives access of up to 10 contributors & 10 reviewers Rate: Base price for Enterprise: $5400/year You have to expand each thread and you can’t edit comments. UXPin is glitchy – it quit on us multiple times.You have to also turn on “auto-resize” feature to adjust the browser size and see the different layouts, or click on the different screen tabs. Clunky and slow animations in preview mode.You can populate each screen size with the same elements in the default view but they won’t be automatically resized to fit the new screen size. Templates and/or forms for Persona, Business Model Canvas, and Project Canvas.PDF export can add the project and page name to each page.File import from Photoshop/Sketch (keeps layers).Annotation pin – allows you to leave notes that you can see in the build page.Chat functionality (when more than one team member is on the prototype build page).Simultaneous, real-time editing by multiple team members.There are also options to upload or create site maps and other UX deliverables for each project. This tool is clearly built by UXers for UXers. The prototypes are easy to share, and teams can work on wireframes together in real-time, similar to Google Docs. Team members can also receive activity notifications via email and view activity history for each project. It allows you to create iterations of your prototypes and view the changes you’ve made with each iteration. In terms of the collaboration features, the workflow isn’t as clean as Invision, but commenting works well. You can edit by clicking on the element rather than using a universal toolbar. It’s easy to create elements and to utilize the widgets. It provides the ability to create wireframes and also conduct usability testing with a Pro+ account. UXPin is the most well-rounded tool of the four we examined. Below are our overall impressions.Īll the tools we examined were strong in the following areas:ĭiscount: Save 10% for an annual subscription = $36 user/month However, some tools do fare better than the others when it comes to the entire package. We don’t recommend one tool as the “best” option because each has strengths that the others don’t. In the midst of our research, we came across Cooper’s prototyping tool review and we were inspired by Cooper’s graphic so we created a similar graphic for our review. No fluid demoĤ breakpoints – prototype is resized for each one (fluid) Prototyping Tools Compared ToolĬreate each break point separately / no automatic readjustment of elements. However, since some members of our team have used Invision before and really liked its features, we made an exception for it even though it doesn’t support the ability to create wireframes from scratch. If possible, a usability testing feature, or usability testing integration with other toolsĪs a result, some popular tools like Axure RP, Omnigraffle, and Balsamiq were eliminated from our final review because they did not fit the above criteria.Allow for a corporate account of about 25 people.Ability to create wireframes from scratch within the tool (some only allow uploading images).Ability to create both low- and high-fidelity wireframes.Designed for prototyping websites (many prototyping tools are mobile-only).Over the course of our evaluation, we looked at over 50 different prototyping tools and evaluated each according to the following criteria: We recently conducted an evaluation of digital prototyping tools, and we thought we would share what we found so that other designers could better understand the pros and cons of these different tools. At Forum One, we’re always looking for the best tools to help us create innovative and impactful designs for our clients.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |